The information in this blog is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for advice on your specific situation. We make no guarantees about the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. Reliance on any information in this blog is at your own risk.
Indie and mid-tier game studios in Ontario live or die by their intellectual property. Code, concept art, dialogue scripts, music scores, proprietary engines—every creative element becomes part of the studio’s value proposition when pitching to publishers, negotiating platform deals, or courting investors. Yet many teams still hire developers—whether employees, contractors, or collaborators—without airtight IP assignment clauses in place. That omission can derail funding rounds, delay launches, and even trigger takedown notices that erase months of revenue.
Below, we unpack why IP ownership is so pivotal for game studios, how Canadian copyright law treats employees versus independent contractors, and what key provisions every development agreement should include to secure clean, enforceable rights.
Copyright Defaults Put Studios at Risk
Under Canada’s Copyright Act, the first owner of a creative work is its author: the individual who writes the code or designs the character. For employees, copyright vests in the employer only if the work is created “in the course of employment” and the employment agreement says nothing to the contrary. For independent contractors—freelance concept artists, composers, level designers—copyright stays with the contractor unless they sign a written assignment.
That distinction matters because a modern game is a stitched-together tapestry of contributions from in-house staff, remote freelancers, and asset-store purchases. If even one contributor retains copyright, the studio may possess only an implied, non-exclusive licence to the work. That weak chain of title invites problems:
- Investor and publisher due diligence: Any murkiness around ownership triggers lengthy legal reviews, price chips, or flat refusals to fund.
– - Platform takedowns: A disgruntled contractor who owns a slice of your codebase can issue DMCA notices to Steam, Epic, or consoles, pulling the game until the dispute resolves.
– - Sequel and DLC roadblocks: Without clear ownership, re-using assets in expansions may constitute infringement.
Moral Rights: Canada’s Hidden Hurdle
Even when a contractor does assign economic rights, they still hold moral rights—the rights of integrity and attribution—unless they expressly waive them. A character artist could object if you recolour their design, localise it for another market, or use it in promotional material they deem “prejudicial to their honour or reputation.” Studios that neglect moral-rights waivers may find themselves unable to adapt or monetise key assets down the line.
Key Clauses Every Developer Agreement Should Contain
1. Broad IP Assignment
The contract should state that the developer “irrevocably assigns to the Studio all right, title, and interest—including copyrights, patents, industrial design rights, and trade-secret rights—in and to any Work Product created in connection with the project.” Casting a wide net avoids loopholes.
2. Future Works Provision
Game development evolves sprint by sprint. Include language assigning future discoveries or improvements, ensuring coverage for features conceived after the contract date.
3. Moral-Rights Waiver
Add a sentence waiving integrity and attribution rights “to the fullest extent permitted by law.” This grants the studio flexibility to edit, localise, and market without seeking further consent.
4. Background Technology Licence
Developers may rely on their own libraries or tools. Carve out those pre-existing assets but secure a perpetual, royalty-free licence for any embedded components, so the final build remains fully exploitable.
5. Delivery of Source Assets
Stipulate that upon each milestone—and certainly at final delivery—the developer must hand over editable source files, build scripts, and documentation. Ownership without access is useless.
6. Confidentiality & Non-Disclosure
Protect unreleased gameplay loops, narrative spoilers, and monetisation strategies. A robust NDA runs alongside IP assignment, preserving proprietary information.
7. Further Assurances & Cooperation
Require the developer to execute any documents necessary to perfect IP rights—patent filings, copyright registrations—at the studio’s request and expense.
8. Indemnity
If the developer incorporates unlicensed third-party code or plagiarised art, the studio can face infringement claims. Include an indemnity obliging the developer to cover losses stemming from their breaches.
Employees vs. Contractors: Tailoring the Paperwork
- Employees: Ontario employment agreements should still contain explicit assignment and moral-rights waiver language to eliminate doubt, especially for hybrid roles that involve off-hours creativity.
– - Contractors: The assignment must be signed—an email exchange declaring “work for hire” will not suffice in Canada. Define milestones, deliverables, and payment triggers to prevent withheld assets if a fee dispute arises.
Open-Source Code and Asset-Store Purchases
Even with solid assignments, your build can be compromised by external licences:
- Copyleft code (GPL, AGPL) can infect proprietary modules, forcing source disclosure. Require contractor approval before adding high-risk open-source libraries.
– - Unity or Unreal asset-store packs may come with non-transferable licences. Ensure your agreement obliges developers to use only assets whose licences permit integration into commercial projects.
The Due-Diligence Payoff
Publishers, venture capitalists, and acquirers will scrutinise your IP chain. Presenting a clean folder of signed assignments, waivers, and asset-source spreadsheets signals professionalism and accelerates deal timelines. It can also boost valuation: IP certainty translates directly into reduced transaction risk.
Implementation Tips for Studio Founders
- Audit past projects: identify missing signatures and chase them while relationships are positive.
– - Use a template contract with mandatory IP language for all new hires and gig workers.
– - Version-control asset submissions; pair each pull request or art file with a signed assignment schedule.
– - Maintain a central register linking asset filenames to contributor contracts and licences.
– - Budget for legal review before each milestone payment to catch omissions early.
How AMAR-VR LAW Can Help
Our video-game and IP team offers:
- Contract drafting: Ontario-compliant employment and contractor agreements with bullet-proof assignment, waiver, and indemnity provisions.
– - IP audits: Chain-of-title assessments and remediation plans before funding rounds or platform submission.
– - Open-source compliance: Policies and training to keep viral licences out of your codebase.
– - Due-diligence support: Document collation, risk summaries, and representation during publisher negotiations.–
We bridge creative passion and legal precision, ensuring your studio owns every pixel, line, and riff it pays for.
Conclusion
In the fast-moving world of game development, creative freedom flourishes only when ownership is clear. Canadian law places the onus on studios to secure written IP assignments and moral-rights waivers—“work for hire” language alone won’t cut it. By embedding robust clauses in every developer contract and rigorously tracking asset provenance, Ontario game studios can safeguard their most valuable assets, streamline investment processes, and focus on crafting the next hit title without IP ambushes lurking in the code. Contact us today for a consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- Don’t studios automatically own anything created by their contractors?
–
No. Under Canadian copyright law, independent contractors automatically own the copyright in what they create unless they sign a written assignment. “Work-for-hire” language alone is not valid in Canada for contractors — written IP assignment clauses are essential.
– - Do employees automatically assign IP to the studio?
–
Generally yes, but only if the work is created “in the course of employment.” To eliminate any ambiguity, Ontario employment agreements should include explicit IP assignment and moral rights waiver language, especially for employees doing creative work outside regular hours.
– - What are moral rights, and why do they matter?
–
Moral rights allow creators to object to modifications or uses of their work that prejudice their honour or reputation, even after assigning economic rights. Without a written waiver, a disgruntled artist or composer could challenge future edits, localisations, or marketing uses.
– - Is using open-source code safe?
–
It depends. Permissive licences (MIT, BSD, Apache) are generally safe with proper attribution. Copyleft licences (GPL, AGPL) can infect your proprietary code and force public disclosure of your source code. Always review and approve open-source components before integration.
– - How can AMAR-VR LAW help Ontario game studios with IP security?
–
We draft airtight Ontario-compliant developer agreements, conduct IP audits to identify ownership gaps, advise on open-source compliance, and prepare due diligence packages for investors and publishers to ensure your game studio’s IP is clean, enforceable, and deal-ready.